When Stanford University laid off 363 employees on 5th August 2025, the headlines said “budget constraints.” But is it the real reason?
For ages, American universities have relied on tuition, private endowments, philanthropic grants, and, most importantly, federal funding for financial support. Now, the last factor is in trouble.
The Trump administration has systematically tightened its grip on university budgets. Who triggered this? Campus protests against the war in Gaza and the USA’s support for Israel. The administration claims these protests have created hostile environments for Jewish and Israeli students. Protesters argue that criticism of a government’s military actions is not antisemitism.
But the debate is no longer just rhetorical. This has now started to affect their financials. In June, Stanford announced a $140 million reduction in its general funds budget, mentioning changes in federal policy. Weeks later, layoffs followed. Over at UCLA, the government has frozen $330 million in funding. Columbia University has already paid over $220 million in a settlement. Brown paid $50 million. Harvard is still negotiating.
International students, who contribute over $40 billion annually to the US economy, are increasingly cautious. Many are considering alternatives like Canada, Germany, or Australia. These students are not just revenue sources; they are the talent pool for America’s innovation economy. Undermining this pipeline could have downstream effects on tech and research.
Universities themselves are caught in a dilemma. Federal funds support everything from climate science to medical research. But the new conditionality around funding threatens to change what gets researched. When government dictates ideology, academic inquiry falls to a standstill. That has long-term consequences for everything from social cohesion to scientific credibility.
So, the question that arises is who controls knowledge?
The US once promoted its education system as a model of free thought. But when the state begins punishing institutions financially for tolerating dissent, that model starts to look less like a beacon and more like a battleground.
Interested in how we think about the markets?
Read more: Zen And The Art Of Investing
Watch here: Investing in Passive Funds
